Bâton de Berger mini vs Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G
Overall, Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bâton de Berger mini
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bâton de Berger mini | Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 510 kcal | 465 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has 41% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.2 g).
- Only Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Bâton de Berger mini
Viande de porc (origine: UE), sel, LACTOSE, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydant: acide ascorbique, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium, ferments, Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène, cellulose, Présence possible de fruits à coques, 180g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100 g de produit fini,
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G
Viande de porc (origine U.E.), sel, LACTOSE, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène. 180g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bâton de Berger mini or Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G?
Overall, Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has fewer calories: 465 kcal versus 510 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.