Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G vs Le fuet pur porc
Overall, Le fuet pur porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G
Le fuet pur porc
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G | Le fuet pur porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 465 kcal | 425 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le fuet pur porc has 20% less saturated fat (12 g vs 15 g).
- Le fuet pur porc has 27% less salt (3.5 g vs 4.8 g).
- Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has 14% more protein (28 g vs 24 g).
- Only Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G
Viande de porc (origine U.E.), sel, LACTOSE, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène. 180g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini.
Le fuet pur porc
Viande de porc (Origine: Espagne), sel, maltodextrine, dextrine, arôme, dextrose, épices, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium; conservateur: nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G or Le fuet pur porc?
Overall, Le fuet pur porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le fuet pur porc has fewer calories: 425 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bat.a Picorer Nature Jb 160G has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.