Basquella vs Pâte à tartiner praliné
Overall, Pâte à tartiner praliné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Basquella | Pâte à tartiner praliné |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 530 kcal | 253 kcal |
| Fat | 29.9 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 56.3 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pâte à tartiner praliné has 52% fewer calories (253 kcal vs 530 kcal).
- Pâte à tartiner praliné has 57% less fat (13 g vs 29.9 g).
- Pâte à tartiner praliné has 84% less saturated fat (1 g vs 6.4 g).
- Pâte à tartiner praliné has 52% less sugar (27 g vs 56.3 g).
- Basquella has 12% more protein (5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Pâte à tartiner praliné has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pâte à tartiner praliné is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Basquella lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Basquella
sucre, matière grasse végétale (coprah), cacao en poudre 8%, noisettes 8%, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, _lactosérum_ en poudre, beurre de cacao 1%, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol, vanilline, arôme
Pâte à tartiner praliné
Purée de haricots rouges* 28,2% (eau, farine de haricots rouges), sucre de betterave, eau, noisettes torréfiées* 21%, caramel (sucre, eau), poudre de cacao", sel de Guérande IGP.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Basquella or Pâte à tartiner praliné?
Overall, Pâte à tartiner praliné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pâte à tartiner praliné has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 530 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pâte à tartiner praliné has less sugar: 27 g versus 56.3 g per 100 g.