Barres cerealieres abricot vs Abricot
Overall, Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barres cerealieres abricot | Abricot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 27 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 12 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Avoine |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Barres cerealieres abricot has 74% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Abricot has 19% less sugar (22 g vs 27 g).
- Abricot has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Abricot lists: Gluten, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Avoine.
Ingredients
Barres cerealieres abricot
Not available.
Abricot
Sirop de glucose, flocons d'_avoine_ 19%, morceaux d'abricots secs 14, 9% (abricot 14%, farine de riz), farine de _blé_ 10, 5%, fructoligosaccharides, pétales de maïs 8.5% (maïs 8%, sel, extrait de malt d'_orge_), farine de riz 4.5%, huile de palme, stabilisant: sorbitols, dextrose, sucre, arôme naturel d'abricot, sel, colorant: caramel ordinaire, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_. Peut contenir des traces de lait, d'arachides et de fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barres cerealieres abricot or Abricot?
Overall, Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricot has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricot has less sugar: 22 g versus 27 g per 100 g.