Comparison

Barre Coco-Choco vs Vollmilch KOKOS Happen

Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBarre Coco-ChocoVollmilch KOKOS Happen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 499 kcal 561 kcal
Fat 29 g 36 g
Saturated fat 21 g 31 g
Sugars 34 g 39 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 7 g —
Protein 7.9 g 4.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Barre Coco-Choco has 11% fewer calories (499 kcal vs 561 kcal).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 19% less fat (29 g vs 36 g).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 32% less saturated fat (21 g vs 31 g).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 13% less sugar (34 g vs 39 g).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 41% more protein (7.9 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Only Barre Coco-Choco lists: Gluten, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Barre Coco-Choco

LA COCO, SANS GLUTEN, ENROBÉE DE CHOCOLAT NOIR BIOLOGIQUE, ADAPTÉE AUX PERSONNES e GLUTEN. : Siil.np de flucose*, noix de coco râpée* 22%, chocolat , sucre de canne roux*, beurre de cacao*, de soja* , beurre de cacao*. en pouc Orédients issus de ag cup biologique. . Arachide - Fruits à coque - Lait. dans un atelier

Vollmilch KOKOS Happen

Kokosraspeln 36%, _Vollmilchschokolade_ 25% (Rohrzucker, Kakaobutter, _Vollmilchpulver_, Kakaomasse; Kakao: 41% mindestens ), Reissirup, Agavendicksaft, Reissiruppulver (Reissirup, Sonnenblumenöl, Salz), Reismehl.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Barre Coco-Choco or Vollmilch KOKOS Happen?

Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Barre Coco-Choco has fewer calories: 499 kcal versus 561 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Barre Coco-Choco has less sugar: 34 g versus 39 g per 100 g.

More comparisons