Barre Coco-Choco vs Bounty
Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barre Coco-Choco | Bounty |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 499 kcal | 487 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | — |
| Sugars | 34 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bounty has 10% less fat (26 g vs 29 g).
- Barre Coco-Choco has 29% less sugar (34 g vs 48 g).
- Barre Coco-Choco has 75% more fiber (7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Barre Coco-Choco has 51% more protein (7.9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Barre Coco-Choco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Barre Coco-Choco lists: Gluten, Nuts, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Barre Coco-Choco
LA COCO, SANS GLUTEN, ENROBÉE DE CHOCOLAT NOIR BIOLOGIQUE, ADAPTÉE AUX PERSONNES e GLUTEN. : Siil.np de flucose*, noix de coco râpée* 22%, chocolat , sucre de canne roux*, beurre de cacao*, de soja* , beurre de cacao*. en pouc Orédients issus de ag cup biologique. . Arachide - Fruits à coque - Lait. dans un atelier
Bounty
sucre, noix de coco séchée, sirop de glucose, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, lait écrémé en poudre, perméat de lactosérum (lait), émulsifiants (lécithine de soja, E471), matière grasse du lait, humectant (glycérol), matière grasse de palme, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barre Coco-Choco or Bounty?
Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bounty has fewer calories: 487 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Barre Coco-Choco has less sugar: 34 g versus 48 g per 100 g.