Comparison

Barre Coco-Choco vs Bounty Minis

Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBarre Coco-ChocoBounty Minis
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 499 kcal 488 kcal
Fat 29 g 25.6 g
Saturated fat 21 g 21.1 g
Sugars 34 g 49.1 g
Salt 0 g 0.3 g
Fiber 7 g —
Protein 7.9 g 3.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bounty Minis has 12% less fat (25.6 g vs 29 g).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 31% less sugar (34 g vs 49.1 g).
  • Barre Coco-Choco has 51% more protein (7.9 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Only Barre Coco-Choco lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Barre Coco-Choco

LA COCO, SANS GLUTEN, ENROBÉE DE CHOCOLAT NOIR BIOLOGIQUE, ADAPTÉE AUX PERSONNES e GLUTEN. : Siil.np de flucose*, noix de coco râpée* 22%, chocolat , sucre de canne roux*, beurre de cacao*, de soja* , beurre de cacao*. en pouc Orédients issus de ag cup biologique. . Arachide - Fruits à coque - Lait. dans un atelier

Bounty Minis

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Barre Coco-Choco or Bounty Minis?

Overall, Barre Coco-Choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bounty Minis has fewer calories: 488 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Barre Coco-Choco has less sugar: 34 g versus 49.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons