Comparison

Barre chocolat vs Chocolat Daim

Overall, Barre chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBarre chocolatChocolat Daim
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 442 kcal 536 kcal
Fat 16 g 32 g
Saturated fat 7.4 g 17 g
Sugars 65 g 60 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 4.4 g 3.1 g
Additives22
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Barre chocolat has 18% fewer calories (442 kcal vs 536 kcal).
  • Barre chocolat has 50% less fat (16 g vs 32 g).
  • Barre chocolat has 56% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 17 g).
  • Barre chocolat has 30% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Only Barre chocolat lists: Eggs, Gluten.
  • Only Chocolat Daim lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Barre chocolat

Sucre, sirop de glucose, lait écrémé en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, huile de tournesol, perméat de lactosérum (lait), matière grasse de palme, matière grasse du lait, cacao maigre en poudre, extrait de malt d'orge, sel, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), blanc d'oeuf en poudre. (Peut contenir: cacahuètes fruits à coque).

Chocolat Daim

sucre, huile de plame, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, lactosérum en poudre (de lait), lait écrémé en poudre, amandes(2.9%), beurre concentré, préparation à base de lactosérum (de lait), lait écrémé concentré sucré, sel, émulsifiant (lécithines de soja), arômes.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Barre chocolat or Chocolat Daim?

Overall, Barre chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Barre chocolat has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 536 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat Daim has less sugar: 60 g versus 65 g per 100 g.

More comparisons