Bambussprossen in Scheiben vs Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Overall, Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Bambussprossen in Scheiben
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bambussprossen in Scheiben | Pousses de bambou en tranche... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has 38% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 21 kcal).
- Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bambussprossen in Scheiben has 50% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Bambussprossen in Scheiben
Bambussprossen, Wasser.
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Pousses de bambou 55%, eau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bambussprossen in Scheiben or Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau?
Overall, Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 21 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.