Baking soda vs Reinweinstein Backpulver
Overall, Baking soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking soda | Reinweinstein Backpulver |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 176 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 16.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Lupin, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baking soda has no calories, while Reinweinstein Backpulver has 176 kcal.
- Baking soda has no fat, while Reinweinstein Backpulver has 0.5 g.
- Baking soda has no sugar, while Reinweinstein Backpulver has 0.5 g.
- Reinweinstein Backpulver has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Baking soda is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Reinweinstein Backpulver lists: Lupin, Nuts.
Ingredients
Baking soda
Sodium Bicarbonate 100%
Reinweinstein Backpulver
Maisstärke* , Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat (E 500ii); Säuerungsmittel: Monokaliumtartrat (E 336i) 25% *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel, Walnuss, Cashewnuss und Lupine enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking soda or Reinweinstein Backpulver?
Overall, Baking soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 176 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.