Baking soda vs Gerble Stevia Edulcorant Naturel 45G
Overall, Baking soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking soda | Gerble Stevia Edulcorant Nat... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 395 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baking soda has no calories, while Gerble Stevia Edulcorant Naturel 45G has 395 kcal.
Ingredients
Baking soda
Sodium Bicarbonate 100%
Gerble Stevia Edulcorant Naturel 45G
îndulcitor de masă pudră pe steviol (extras de Stevia reb ază de glicozide de diana) Ingrediente: maltodextrină, îndulcitor: glicozide steviolice din stevia E960a (3%). Indulcitorul provine din ţări NON-UE. Maltodextrina provine din ţări UE. Valori nutritionale Energie Lipide Unitate La **% Pentru o **% de măsură 100g CZR (0,5g) CZR din linguriţă din KJ 1653 8 00 0
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking soda or Gerble Stevia Edulcorant Naturel 45G?
Overall, Baking soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.