Baies Roses vs Steakpfeffer Hamburg
Overall, Baies Roses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baies Roses | Steakpfeffer Hamburg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 296 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 21.6 g |
| Protein | 10.4 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steakpfeffer Hamburg has 16% fewer calories (248 kcal vs 296 kcal).
- Baies Roses has 18% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Baies Roses has no saturated fat, while Steakpfeffer Hamburg has 0.6 g.
- Baies Roses has no sugar, while Steakpfeffer Hamburg has 37 g.
- Baies Roses has no salt, while Steakpfeffer Hamburg has 21.6 g.
- Baies Roses has 22% more protein (10.4 g vs 8.1 g).
Ingredients
Baies Roses
Not available.
Steakpfeffer Hamburg
Schwarzer Pfeffer 38%, Meersalz, grüner Pfeffer 8%, weiler Pfeffer 8%, Rosa Beeren, Rohrohrzucker, Zwiebel, Knoblauch, Petersilie, Chilischrot, Piment
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baies Roses or Steakpfeffer Hamburg?
Overall, Baies Roses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steakpfeffer Hamburg has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baies Roses has less sugar: 0 g versus 37 g per 100 g.