Bacon Fume 10Tr vs Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre
Overall, Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon Fume 10Tr | Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 113 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has 12% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has 14% less fat (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has 15% less salt (2.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Bacon Fume 10Tr lists: Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Bacon Fume 10Tr
Viande de porc origine UE, sel, dextrose, sucre, extraits d'épices, arôme de fumée et/ou arômes, conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, ascorbate de sodium, nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium, ferments. Présence possible de fruits à coques et de lait.
Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre
Filet de porc 95%, correcteur d'acidité : lactate de potassium, sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Porc origine Union Européenne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon Fume 10Tr or Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre?
Overall, Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacon fumé au bois de hêtre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.