Comparison

Baci di dama vs Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla

Overall, Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaci di damaCreazioni Ditali Baci Di Dam...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 551 kcal 564 kcal
Fat 34 g 35 g
Saturated fat 15 g 18 g
Sugars 27 g 24 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.3 g 3.3 g
Protein 6.9 g 7.7 g
Additives02
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baci di dama has 17% less saturated fat (15 g vs 18 g).
  • Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla has 11% less sugar (24 g vs 27 g).
  • Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla has 10% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.9 g).

Ingredients

Baci di dama

Weizenmehl Typ "00", Zucker, Butter (Milch), geröstete Haselnüsse 17%, dunkle Schokolade 12% [Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), natürliches Vanillearoma], Haselnusspaste 3%, Kakaopulver 1%. Kann Nüsse, Mandeln, Pistazien, Eier und Senf enthalten.

Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla

Farine de blé, sucre, beurre concentré, amandes 16%, chocolat 8% (pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, émulsifiants: lécithines de soja, arômes), vanilline.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baci di dama or Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla?

Overall, Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baci di dama has fewer calories: 551 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Creazioni Ditali Baci Di Dama Tortonesi alla Mandorla has less sugar: 24 g versus 27 g per 100 g.

More comparisons