Comparison
Axoa de canard vs Axoa de canard
Overall, Axoa de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Axoa de canard | Axoa de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 7.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 10.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Axoa de canard has 51% less fat (3.5 g vs 7.2 g).
- Axoa de canard has 54% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Axoa de canard has 73% less sugar (1.3 g vs 4.9 g).
- Axoa de canard has 29% more protein (15 g vs 10.7 g).
- Axoa de canard has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Axoa de canard
Not available.
Axoa de canard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Axoa de canard or Axoa de canard?
Overall, Axoa de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Axoa de canard has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Axoa de canard has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.