Comparison
Axoa de canard vs Axoa de canard
Overall, Axoa de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Axoa de canard | Axoa de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Axoa de canard has 43% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Axoa de canard has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Axoa de canard has 15% more protein (15 g vs 12.7 g).
Ingredients
Axoa de canard
Not available.
Axoa de canard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Axoa de canard or Axoa de canard?
Overall, Axoa de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Axoa de canard has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Axoa de canard has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.