Comparison
Asucar vs Stevia
Overall, Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Asucar | Stevia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 100 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Stevia has 93% less sugar (6.7 g vs 100 g).
Ingredients
Asucar
DEXTROSE, MALTODEXTRIN, SPLENDA SUCRALOSE.
Stevia
maltodextrine, édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol Avec rebaudioside A, Peut contenir des traces de lait
FAQ
Which is healthier: Asucar or Stevia?
Overall, Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stevia has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stevia has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 100 g per 100 g.