Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero vs Arnold palmer
Overall, Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Arnold Palmer, Half & Half I... | Arnold palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has 92% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has 95% less sugar (0.3 g vs 5.4 g).
Ingredients
Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero
Premium brewed blend of black teas using filtered water, lemon juice from concentrate, pear juice from concentrate, citric acid, natural flavors, malic acid, sucralose, gum acacia, ester gum.
Arnold palmer
Premium brewed blend of black teas using filtered water, high fructose corn syrup (glucose-fructose syrup), lemon juice from concentrate, pear juice from concentrate, citric acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin c), natural flavors sucralose (splenda brand), acesu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero or Arnold palmer?
Overall, Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Arnold Palmer, Half & Half Iced Tea Lemonade, Zero has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.