Comparison

Aquarius Naranja vs VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L

Overall, VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientAquarius NaranjaVITTEL 100% NATUREL eau arom...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 19 kcal 7 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 4.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has 63% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 19 kcal).
  • VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has 67% less sugar (1.5 g vs 4.5 g).
  • VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Aquarius Naranja

Eau; sucre; acidifiants: acide citrique, acide malique; exhausteurs de goût: chlorure de sodium, phosphates de potassium et de , sélénate de sodium; édulcorants: sucralose, acesulfame-K; arômes naturels d'agrumes; colorant: carotènes.

VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L

Eau minérale naturelle Vittel 95.2%, sucre liquide 2,2%, jus de citron, arôme naturel de citron-citron vert.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Aquarius Naranja or VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L?

Overall, VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

VITTEL 100% NATUREL eau aromatisée Citron & Citron vert 1L has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons