Apfelschorle vs Appletiser
Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Apfelschorle | Appletiser |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 27 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 9.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfelschorle has 37% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Appletiser has no fat, while Apfelschorle has 0.5 g.
- Apfelschorle has 35% less sugar (6.2 g vs 9.6 g).
- Apfelschorle has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Apfelschorle has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Apfelschorle
Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat (60 %), natürliches Mineralwasser, Kohlensäure, natürliches Apfelsaftaroma,
Appletiser
RECONSTITUTED APPLE JUICE CONCENTRATE, CARBON DIOXIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE APPLETISER
FAQ
Which is healthier: Apfelschorle or Appletiser?
Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfelschorle has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apfelschorle has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 9.6 g per 100 g.