Apfelsaftschorle vs Schorle
Overall, Apfelsaftschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Apfelsaftschorle | Schorle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.9 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfelsaftschorle has 88% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Apfelsaftschorle has 12% less sugar (5.9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Apfelsaftschorle has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Schorle has 88% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Apfelsaftschorle has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Apfelsaftschorle
Not available.
Schorle
Schweizer Bio-Apfelsaft (60%) (mit max. 10% Schweizer Bio-Birnensaft) aus Konzentrat, Wasser, Kohlensäure. Pasteurisiert. Vegan.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Apfelsaftschorle or Schorle?
Overall, Apfelsaftschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfelsaftschorle has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apfelsaftschorle has less sugar: 5.9 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.