Andalouse sauce vs Heinz Andalouse Sauce
Overall, Heinz Andalouse Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Andalouse sauce | Heinz Andalouse Sauce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 544 kcal |
| Fat | 56.2 g | 56.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.6 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 6.1 g | 6.1 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 7 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans | Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Andalouse sauce
Huile de soja 54%, eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 3,7%, vinaigre d'alcool, purée de tomates 6,0%, jaune d'œuf, sucre, graines de moutarde en poudre, sel, herbes, colorants (caramel naturel), épices, poivre de Cayenne, poudre d'oignon, modifié amidon de maïs, conservateur (sorbate de potassium), extraits d'épices, épaississants (gomme guar, gomme xanthane), antioxydant (EDTA calcique disodique).
Heinz Andalouse Sauce
Huile de SOJA 54%, eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 3,7%, vinaigre, purée de tomates mi-réduite 6,0%, jaunes d'OEUF, sucre, graine de MOUTARDE en poudre, sel, herbes, colorant (caramel ordinaire), épices, piment de Cayenne, poudre d'oignon, amidon modifié de maïs, sorbate de potassium, extraits d'épices, gomme de guar, gomme xanthane, extrait riche en tocophérols, calcium disodium EDTA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Andalouse sauce or Heinz Andalouse Sauce?
Overall, Heinz Andalouse Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Andalouse sauce has fewer calories: 544 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Andalouse sauce has less sugar: 6.1 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.