Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale vs Amatriciana sugo
Overall, Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale
Amatriciana sugo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amatriciana - Tomates et gua... | Amatriciana sugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 34% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 163 kcal).
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 46% less fat (7 g vs 13 g).
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 77% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.3 g).
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 54% less sugar (3 g vs 6.5 g).
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 53% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Amatriciana sugo has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
- Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale
Not available.
Amatriciana sugo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale or Amatriciana sugo?
Overall, Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has less sugar: 3 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.