Comparison
Agavendicksaft vs Ahornsirup
Overall, Agavendicksaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Agavendicksaft | Ahornsirup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 2 |
| Calories | 307 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 75 g | 87 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Agavendicksaft has 14% fewer calories (307 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Ahornsirup has no fat, while Agavendicksaft has 0.5 g.
- Agavendicksaft has 14% less sugar (75 g vs 87 g).
- Agavendicksaft has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Agavendicksaft has the better Nutri-Score.
- Agavendicksaft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Agavendicksaft
Agavendicksaft
Ahornsirup
ahornsirup
FAQ
Which is healthier: Agavendicksaft or Ahornsirup?
Overall, Agavendicksaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Agavendicksaft has fewer calories: 307 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Agavendicksaft has less sugar: 75 g versus 87 g per 100 g.