Comparison
Acelga en tarro vs Acelgas
Overall, Acelga en tarro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acelga en tarro | Acelgas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | — |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acelga en tarro has 52% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Acelga en tarro has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3 g).
- Acelgas has 73% more protein (3 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Acelga en tarro
Acelga, agua, sal y antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Acelgas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acelga en tarro or Acelgas?
Overall, Acelga en tarro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acelga en tarro has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelga en tarro has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.