Comparison
Abondance vs Abondance
Overall, Abondance has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abondance | Abondance |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 397 kcal | 429 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abondance has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Abondance has 67% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Abondance has 24% more protein (33 g vs 25 g).
- Abondance has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Abondance
Not available.
Abondance
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abondance or Abondance?
Overall, Abondance has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abondance has fewer calories: 397 kcal versus 429 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abondance has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.