Comparison
Abondance vs Abondance AOP
Overall, Abondance AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abondance | Abondance AOP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 397 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abondance AOP has no sugar, while Abondance has 0.5 g.
- Only Abondance AOP lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Abondance
Not available.
Abondance AOP
Lait cru de vache, sel, ferments lactiques, présure. Lait issu de l'aire géographique définie par l'AOP.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abondance or Abondance AOP?
Overall, Abondance AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abondance has fewer calories: 397 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abondance AOP has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.