Comparison

2Bramley apple crumbles vs No-Bake Raspberry Crumble

Overall, No-Bake Raspberry Crumble has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient2Bramley apple crumblesNo-Bake Raspberry Crumble
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 288 kcal 450 kcal
Fat 12.9 g 24 g
Saturated fat 7.8 g 7.2 g
Sugars 20.1 g 21 g
Salt — 0.6 g
Fiber 1.4 g 6.2 g
Protein 3.1 g 10 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 2Bramley apple crumbles has 36% fewer calories (288 kcal vs 450 kcal).
  • 2Bramley apple crumbles has 46% less fat (12.9 g vs 24 g).
  • No-Bake Raspberry Crumble has 78% more fiber (6.2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • No-Bake Raspberry Crumble has 69% more protein (10 g vs 3.1 g).
  • No-Bake Raspberry Crumble is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

2Bramley apple crumbles

Pommes Bramley (42%) - farine de blé contient gluten (farine de blé, Carbonate de calcium, fer, Niacine, Thiamine) - Beurre (lait) (10%) - sucre - sucre roux - eau - huile de colza - fécule de maïs - huile de palme - amidon de blé (contient Gluten) - sel - levure - gélifiant : Pectine (issue de Fruits) - Émulsifiant : E471.

No-Bake Raspberry Crumble

Gluten-Free Whole Grain Oat Flakes, Coconut Blossom Syrup, Almond Butter, Cashew Butter, Cocoa Butter, Freeze-Dried Raspberries, Sea Salt, Vanilla Extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: 2Bramley apple crumbles or No-Bake Raspberry Crumble?

Overall, No-Bake Raspberry Crumble has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2Bramley apple crumbles has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

2Bramley apple crumbles has less sugar: 20.1 g versus 21 g per 100 g.

More comparisons