1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger vs Red Bull Sugarfree
Overall, Red Bull Sugarfree has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger | Red Bull Sugarfree |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 3 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Bull Sugarfree has 85% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Red Bull Sugarfree has no sugar, while 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has 4.4 g.
- 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Red Bull Sugarfree has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger
Eau gazéifiée, sucre, acidifiant: acide citrique, taurine (0,4%), correcteur d'acidité: citrate trisodique, arôme, colorant: caramel ordinaire, caféine (0,02%), inositol, glucuronolactone, conservateurs : benzoate de sodium et sorbate de potassium, édulcorant: sucralose, vitamines : niacine (B3), acide pantothénique (B5), vitamines B6 et B12.
Red Bull Sugarfree
In moderaten Mengen Nahrwertdeklaration Energie Felt
FAQ
Which is healthier: 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger or Red Bull Sugarfree?
Overall, Red Bull Sugarfree has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Bull Sugarfree has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Bull Sugarfree has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.