Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar
Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar by Yesgagao provides 572 kcal per 100 g, with 16 g of sugars and 4 g of protein. That is 66% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Chocolate candies category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 25 g (25 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 572 kcal | 143 kcal | 510 +12% | |
| Total fat | 44 g | 11 g | 14% | 31.6 +39% |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 8 g | 40% | 19.4 +65% |
| Carbohydrates | 36 g | 9 g | 3% | 56.5 −36% |
| Total sugars | 16 g | 4 g | 46.4 −66% | |
| Dietary fiber | 8 g | 2 g | 7% | 4.5 +78% |
| Protein | 4 g | 1 g | 2% | 6.5 −38% |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g | 0.3 −66% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 7351 Chocolate candies products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other chocolate candies
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Cacao*, coconut palm sugar*, sundried cane juice crystals*, lucuma*, maca*, mesquite*, vanilla*, shilajit, reishi*, tulsi*, himalayan salt, gynostemma*, fennel*, peppermint*.
Product details
- Serving size
- 25 g (25 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0867690000006
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar?
Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar contains 572 kcal per 100 g and about 143 kcal per serving (25 g (25 g)).
How much sugar is in Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar?
Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar has 16 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Yesgagao, dirty, botanical chocolate bar healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More chocolate candies
View all →
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e