Nutrition report ready

Viande séchée à l’ancienne

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Viande séchée à l’ancienne

in Beef jerkies Barcode 2163691007807
Bad nutritional quality

Viande séchée à l’ancienne provides 200 kcal per 100 g, with 0.7 g of sugars and 43 g of protein. That is 96% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Beef jerkies category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
2.2 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.9 g · Low
Sugars
0.7 g · Low
Salt
5.9 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 200 kcal 305 −35%
Total fat 2.2 g 7 −68%
Saturated fat 0.9 g 2.2 −60%
Carbohydrates 2.1 g 20.4 −90%
Total sugars 0.7 g 18.3 −96%
Dietary fiber 0.5 g 0.8 −35%
Protein 43 g 39.1 +10%
Salt 5.9 g 3.7 +59%

Category average across 881 Beef jerkies products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other beef jerkies

Calories lower 7%
Sugars lower 14%
Salt higher 6%
Saturated fat lower 36%
Protein top 26%
Fiber top 19%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Switzerland
Barcode
2163691007807

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Viande séchée à l’ancienne?

Viande séchée à l’ancienne contains 200 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Viande séchée à l’ancienne?

Viande séchée à l’ancienne has 0.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Viande séchée à l’ancienne healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Viande séchée à l’ancienne? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More beef jerkies

View all →