View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose
Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose by Aromandise provides 177 kcal per 100 g, with 1.8 g of sugars and 22.3 g of protein. That is 84% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Beverages category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 kcal | 88 +101% |
| Total fat | 4.2 g | 1.9 +118% |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1.1 −26% |
| Carbohydrates | 7 g | 12.9 −46% |
| Total sugars | 1.8 g | 11 −84% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 4.8 −100% |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 2.9 +676% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 −92% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 22486 Beverages products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other beverages
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
sachet de thé (40g) : feuilles de thé noir* Camelia sinensis ; sachet de rose (12g) : boutons de rose* Rosa damascenl *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique. Dose recommandée pour un maximum de bienfaits : 2,5g de thé noirparjour (1 cc rase équivaut à 1,8g). Ne peut remplacer une alimentation variée, équilibrée et un mode de vie sain. Il est recommandé de respecter les doses conseillées
Product details
- Labels & certifications
- OrganicEU OrganicAb agriculture biologique
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3560468793083
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose?
Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose contains 177 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose?
Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose has 1.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Thé Bio / Thé Noir et boutons de rose healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 19, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1
b
b
b More beverages
View all →
b NOVA 4
c NOVA 4
a NOVA 1
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 4 More from Aromandise
View all →
NOVA 1
NOVA 1
NOVA 1
NOVA 3
e
NOVA 4