Terrine de porc à la châtaigne

by Charles Antona 100 g in Pork terrines Barcode 3425477102083
Bad nutritional quality

Terrine de porc à la châtaigne by Charles Antona provides 270 kcal per 100 g, with 2.4 g of sugars and 10 g of protein. That is 191% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Pork terrines category and comes in a 100 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
23 g · High
Saturated fat
9.1 g · High
Sugars
2.4 g · Low
Salt
1.8 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 270 kcal 309 −13%
Total fat 23 g 26.7 −14%
Saturated fat 9.1 g 9.9 −8%
Carbohydrates 6 g 2.6 +130%
Total sugars 2.4 g 0.8 +191%
Protein 10 g 14.7 −32%
Salt 1.8 g 1.8

Category average across 166 Pork terrines products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other pork terrines

Calories lower 22%
Sugars higher 5%
Salt higher 25%
Saturated fat lower 29%
Protein top 98%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
100 g
Labels & certifications
No preservativesNo colorings
Sold in
France
Barcode
3425477102083

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Terrine de porc à la châtaigne?

Terrine de porc à la châtaigne contains 270 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Terrine de porc à la châtaigne?

Terrine de porc à la châtaigne has 2.4 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Terrine de porc à la châtaigne healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 20, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Terrine de porc à la châtaigne? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More pork terrines

View all →

More from Charles Antona

View all →