Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker

by gardel 2kg in Cane sugar Barcode 3337708820027
Bad nutritional quality
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker by gardel provides 399 kcal per 100 g, with 99.6 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 14% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Cane sugar category and comes in a 2kg pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
99.6 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 399 kcal 382
Total fat 0 g 0.3 −100%
Saturated fat 0 g 0 −100%
Carbohydrates 99.7 g 95.6
Total sugars 99.6 g 87.5 +14%
Added sugars 0 g 70.1 −100%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0 −100%
Protein 0 g 0.2 −100%
Salt 0 g 0.1 −100%

Category average across 372 Cane sugar products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other cane sugar

Calories higher 42%
Sugars higher 36%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 100%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

(t acides gras des t sucres Protéines

Product details

Quantity
2kg
Sold in
France, Guadeloupe
Barcode
3337708820027

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker?

Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker contains 399 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker?

Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker has 99.6 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 19, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Sucre de canne - Rohrzucker? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More cane sugar

View all →

More from gardel

View all →