Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag
Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag by Rynkeby provides 38 kcal per 100 g, with 8.9 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 53% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Dagligvarer category and comes in a 0,33 l pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38 kcal | 265 −86% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 13 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 9 g | 32.3 −72% |
| Total sugars | 8.9 g | 18.9 −53% |
| Added sugars | 8.9 g | 12 −26% |
| Protein | 0 g | 8.2 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2038 Dagligvarer products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other dagligvarer
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Vand, sukker, pink grapefrugtjuice* (7 %), citronjuice*, tranebærjuice* (1 %), sort gulerodsjuice*, kuldioxid, stabilisatorer (pektin og johannesbrødkernemel) og naturlig pink grapefrugtaroma. * Fra koncentrat.
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 0,33 l
- Sold in
- Denmark
- Barcode
- 5705010084112
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag?
Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag contains 38 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag?
Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag has 8.9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Rynkeby Frugtbrus m. pink grape- og tranebærsmag healthy?
It is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 9, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
e NOVA 3 
e NOVA 3 More dagligvarer
View all →
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 1 
c NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 1 More from Rynkeby
View all →
b 
d 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
b 
b NOVA 4