Nutrition report ready
Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint
Nutri-Score C NOVA 3
View detailsRunningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint
Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint by Runningbyrd Tea Company provides 15 kcal per 100 ml, with 3.8 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 44% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Iced teas category.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 8 oza (237 ml)
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 kcal | 36 kcal | 31 −52% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 3.8 g | 9 g | 3% | 7.5 −49% |
| Total sugars | 3.8 g | 9 g | 6.8 −44% | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.2 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.1 −86% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3400 Iced teas products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from October 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other iced teas
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Water, blended tea, organic cane sugar.
Product details
- Serving size
- 8 oza (237 ml)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0723175974401
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint?
Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint contains 15 kcal per 100 ml and about 36 kcal per serving (8 oza (237 ml)).
How much sugar is in Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint?
Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint has 3.8 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Runningbyrd tea company, tea, montgomery mint healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b 
b More iced teas
View all →
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4