Nutrition report ready

&quot

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E

View details

&quot

400 g in Candies Barcode 9002859047565
Bad nutritional quality
Green-Score
b
Environmental impact estimate

&quot provides 379 kcal per 100 g, with 89 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. That is 63% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Candies category and comes in a 400 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
1.4 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.5 g · Low
Sugars
89 g · High
Salt
0.1 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 379 kcal 364
Total fat 1.4 g 3.3 −57%
Saturated fat 0.5 g 1.9 −74%
Carbohydrates 92 g 81.5 +13%
Total sugars 89 g 54.5 +63%
Added sugars 0 g 49.3 −100%
Protein 0.5 g 2.1 −76%
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 −73%

Category average across 11657 Candies products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other candies

Calories higher 46%
Sugars higher 7%
Salt higher 48%
Saturated fat higher 36%
Protein top 57%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

lortadleares/ sockerarter/zaharuri/cukry/sokereita/cukry/oákyapa/cukrok cukry/cukuri/suhkrud /acúcares laumvielas/valgud/proteínas/6emtbun/beljakovine/protein/ protein sul/sal/salt/sare/sol/suola/ sól /ahár/só/druska/ sāls/ sool /sal/con/sof/salt/salt zucker/sucres/zuccheri/suikers/sugarsrotein/bilkoviny/proteinas/protein/proteine/ bielkoviny /proteiini / bialko / utrizionale per: /voedingswaardevermng per: / nutritional deklaratier derlaratia nutritio ιστροφικ τ andeklaratn per: / déclaration nut elle pour:/d cdaration per:/vyživové údaje na: /información nutr avintoarvoilmoituksessa per:/ informacji o w dekacijoje iki: / uzturvērtības markējums līdz: / toltumd s:/ ge cior mgaauma ha: /označevanje hravlne vrednosti: /næringsinnfhold per:/noring n energie/ie/ energia / energie/ es ergetická hodnota / vuror energéico / energi ,are/entetică / eneraia / energia/warto c anergetyczna / evépyeia energia / energinė verté / enerģetiská vé eoinsisalas/c,gia/eneprwäha ctomhoct/energijsa nednost/forbrenningsverdi/enerai fet/matières sses /grassi /vetten / fat/tuky/grasas/fett/ grăsimi / tuky/ rasva / thuszcz / aunapá / zsír / riebalai / tauki / nasvad/lipidos/mazhuhn / maščobe / fett/fedt danon/ dont/di cui /waarvan/of which/z toho/de las cuales/varav/ din care/z toho /josta/wtym/ek twv onoiov /amelyből/iš kurių /tostarp/millest/dos quais/ot kowto/od tega/derav/heraf jesittigte fettsäuren/acides gras saturés / acidi grassi saturi / verzadigde vetzuren / saturates/nasycené mastné kyseliny / aturadas/mättat fett /acizi grași saturați /nasýtene inastné kyseliny / tyydyttynyttä / kwasy tłuszczowe nasycone/kopequéva / telitett zsírsavak / sočiujų riebalų rugščių / piesātinātās taukskābes/ küllastunud rasvhapped /saturados/ hachtehn macthm kacenwha/nasičene maščobe/mettet fett, mættede fedtsyrer kohlenhydrate/gluddes carboidrati / koolhydraten / carbohydrate/sacharidy /hidratos de carbono / kolhydrat/glucide / sacharidy/hillihydraatit /owodany/uoatáv8pakeç / szénhidrát / angliavandeniai / oglhidrati / susivesikud/hidratos de carbono/bbrnexmaparw/ogljikovi hidrati / karbohydrater/kulhydrat výzivové ádaje na: den: / ma tingumo нителната 100 g 1610kj/

May contain palm oil

Product details

Quantity
400 g
Sold in
France
Barcode
9002859047565

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in &quot?

&quot contains 379 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in &quot?

&quot has 89 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is &quot healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 29, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried &quot? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More candies

View all →