View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon
Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon by Clos Mathieu provides 67 kcal per 100 g, with 16.5 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 58% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Squeezed apple juices category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 kcal | 46 +45% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 16.6 g | 11.1 +49% |
| Total sugars | 16.5 g | 10.5 +58% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 |
| Dietary fiber | 0.2 g | 0.3 −28% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 966 Squeezed apple juices products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other squeezed apple juices
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
100% Pur jus de Pomme
Product details
- Labels & certifications
- OrganicEU OrganicFR-BIO-01Ab agriculture biologique
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3760268380005
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon?
Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon contains 67 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon?
Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon has 16.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Pur jus de Pommes du roussillon vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 19, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 
c More squeezed apple juices
View all →
c NOVA 1 
d NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 
d NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 
d NOVA 1