View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Pur jus de pomme pétillant
Pur jus de pomme pétillant by Chateau Lézergué provides 48 kcal per 100 g, with 10 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Beverages category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 48 kcal | 88 −45% |
| Total fat | 0.3 g | 1.9 −83% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 11.2 g | 12.9 −13% |
| Total sugars | 10 g | 11 −9% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 4.8 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 −100% |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 −61% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 22479 Beverages products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other beverages
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Jus de pomme, dioxyde de carbone,
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3760031903028
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Pur jus de pomme pétillant?
Pur jus de pomme pétillant contains 48 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Pur jus de pomme pétillant?
Pur jus de pomme pétillant has 10 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Pur jus de pomme pétillant healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Pur jus de pomme pétillant vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 24, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b 
b More beverages
View all →
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4
a NOVA 1 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 