Pommes et chataignes

by Charles & Alice in Chestnut applesauces Barcode 0102506955898
Average nutritional quality
Green-Score
a+
Environmental impact estimate

Pommes et chataignes by Charles & Alice provides 80 kcal per 100 g, with 16 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. That is 22% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Chestnut applesauces category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0.5 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.1 g · Low
Sugars
16 g · Moderate
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 80 kcal 110 −27%
Total fat 0.5 g 0.4 +29%
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 +19%
Carbohydrates 19 g 25.3 −25%
Total sugars 16 g 20.5 −22%
Protein 0.5 g 0.5
Salt 0 g 0 −56%

Category average across 57 Chestnut applesauces products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chestnut applesauces

Calories lower 5%
Sugars lower 18%
Salt lower 38%
Saturated fat lower 47%
Protein top 73%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
OrganicEU OrganicAb agriculture biologique
Sold in
France
Barcode
0102506955898

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Pommes et chataignes?

Pommes et chataignes contains 80 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Pommes et chataignes?

Pommes et chataignes has 16 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Pommes et chataignes healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 19, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Pommes et chataignes? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chestnut applesauces

View all →

More from Charles & Alice

View all →