View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot
Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot by Jack Links provides 277 kcal per 100 g, with 24 g of sugars and 35 g of protein. That is 31% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Beef jerkies category and comes in a 60g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 portion (20 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 55 kcal | 306 −9% | |
| Total fat | 3.7 g | 0.7 g | 1% | 7 −47% |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.3 g | 2% | 2.3 −29% |
| Carbohydrates | 26 g | 5.2 g | 2% | 20.4 +27% |
| Total sugars | 24 g | 4.8 g | 18.3 +31% | |
| Protein | 35 g | 7 g | 14% | 39.2 −11% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 3.7 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 879 Beef jerkies products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other beef jerkies
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 60g
- Serving size
- 1 portion (20 g)
- Sold in
- United Kingdom
- Barcode
- 4251097423371
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot?
Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot contains 277 kcal per 100 g and about 55 kcal per serving (1 portion (20 g)).
How much sugar is in Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot?
Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot has 24 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Mr Beast Beef Jerky Sweet & Hot healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More beef jerkies
View all →
b NOVA 3 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 More from Jack Links
View all →
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4