Nutrition report ready

Kyoto original milk tea

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Kyoto original milk tea

250 g in Teas Barcode 0673367650753
Bad nutritional quality

Kyoto original milk tea provides 480 kcal per 100 ml, with 68 g of sugars and 4 g of protein. That is 876% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Teas category and comes in a 250 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 ml

Fat
12 g · High
Saturated fat
8 g · High
Sugars
68 g · High
Salt
0.4 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 ml Category avg
Calories 480 kcal 59 +715%
Total fat 12 g 1 +1075%
Saturated fat 8 g 0.6 +1299%
Carbohydrates 84 g 11.3 +641%
Total sugars 68 g 7 +876%
Dietary fiber 0 g 1.9 −100%
Protein 4 g 1.5 +167%
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 +51%

Category average across 3493 Teas products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other teas

Calories higher 1%
Sugars higher 4%
Salt higher 6%
Saturated fat higher 2%
Protein top 8%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
250 g
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0673367650753

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Kyoto original milk tea?

Kyoto original milk tea contains 480 kcal per 100 ml.

How much sugar is in Kyoto original milk tea?

Kyoto original milk tea has 68 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Kyoto original milk tea healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated January 6, 2023. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Kyoto original milk tea? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More teas

View all →