Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea
Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea by Tres Karkade provides 8 kcal per 100 ml, with 2.1 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 69% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Iced teas category.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 8 onz (236 ml)
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 8 kcal | 19 kcal | 31 −75% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 2.1 g | 5 g | 2% | 7.5 −72% |
| Total sugars | 2.1 g | 5 g | 6.8 −69% | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.2 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3400 Iced teas products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from July 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other iced teas
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Purified water, organic hibiscus calyces, organic agave nectar
Product details
- Serving size
- 8 onz (236 ml)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0855860004039
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea?
Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea contains 8 kcal per 100 ml and about 19 kcal per serving (8 onz (236 ml)).
How much sugar is in Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea?
Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea has 2.1 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Classic Simple Hibiscus Tea healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 23, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
b 
b NOVA 1 
NOVA 1 More iced teas
View all →
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4