Nutrition report ready
Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol
Nutri-Score E
View details
View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol
Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol by Bishops provides 402 kcal per 100 g, with 61.3 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. That is 13% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Candies category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 portion (25 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 402 kcal | 101 kcal | 364 +10% | |
| Total fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g | 0% | 3.3 −79% |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g | 1% | 1.9 −79% |
| Carbohydrates | 98.7 g | 24.7 g | 9% | 81.5 +21% |
| Total sugars | 61.3 g | 15.3 g | 54.5 +13% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g | 0% | 2.7 −81% |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.1 g | 0% | 2.1 −76% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.3 −97% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 11650 Candies products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other candies
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1 portion (25 g)
- Sold in
- United Kingdom
- Barcode
- 5021690203484
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol?
Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol contains 402 kcal per 100 g and about 101 kcal per serving (1 portion (25 g)).
How much sugar is in Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol?
Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol has 61.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Bishops T CLASSIC MINT HUMBUGS ENERGY 427J QU8G Ol healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 16, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More candies
View all →
e NOVA 4
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
