View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker
Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker by Bio Fan provides 390 kcal per 100 g, with 95.5 g of sugars and 1.7 g of protein. That is 14% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Coconut sugar category and comes in a 200gr pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 390 kcal | 376 |
| Total fat | 1 g | 0.5 +104% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 96.6 g | 91.8 +5% |
| Total sugars | 95.5 g | 83.7 +14% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 60.5 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.8 g | 1.2 −35% |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.4 +26% |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.3 +500% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 243 Coconut sugar products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other coconut sugar
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Kokosbloesemsuiker
Product details
- Quantity
- 200gr
- Labels & certifications
- OrganicEU OrganicNL-BIO-01
- Sold in
- Belgium
- Barcode
- 8718754502436
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker?
Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker contains 390 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker?
Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker has 95.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Bio fan kokosbloesemsuiker vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 9, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 More coconut sugar
View all →
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 