View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
0.0% Rosé
0.0% Rosé by Wieckse provides 33 kcal per 100 ml, with 1.8 g of sugars and 0.4 g of protein. That is 40% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Non-alcoholic wheat beers category. Contains: gluten.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 kcal | 26 +27% |
| Total fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 +41% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 7.8 g | 5.7 +36% |
| Total sugars | 1.8 g | 3 −40% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.3 g | 0 +1567% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.4 −11% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 −53% |
*% Daily Value for 100 ml, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 50 Non-alcoholic wheat beers products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other non-alcoholic wheat beers
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Water, gerstemout, tarwemout, vruchtensap 15% uit concentraat (appelsap, vierbessensap, kersensap, frambozensap, bosbessensap), hop, natuurlijke aroma's, zoetstof: steviol glycosiden
- Allergens
- Gluten
Product details
- Sold in
- Netherlands
- Barcode
- 8712000032067
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in 0.0% Rosé?
0.0% Rosé contains 33 kcal per 100 ml.
How much sugar is in 0.0% Rosé?
0.0% Rosé has 1.8 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is 0.0% Rosé healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does 0.0% Rosé contain?
According to the label data it contains: Gluten. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 10, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b 
b 
b 
b NOVA 1 More non-alcoholic wheat beers
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 