Comparison
Zymil vs Zymil
Overall, Zymil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zymil | Zymil |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zymil has 21% fewer calories (34 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Zymil has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Zymil has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Zymil has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Zymil
Not available.
Zymil
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zymil or Zymil?
Overall, Zymil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zymil has fewer calories: 34 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zymil has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.