Zucchero decorato santa vs Raspelschokolade weiß
Overall, Zucchero decorato santa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zucchero decorato santa | Raspelschokolade weiß |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 427 kcal | 545 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 30.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 83.4 g | 57.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 6 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zucchero decorato santa has 22% fewer calories (427 kcal vs 545 kcal).
- Zucchero decorato santa has 77% less fat (6.9 g vs 30.4 g).
- Zucchero decorato santa has 84% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 22 g).
- Raspelschokolade weiß has 31% less sugar (57.2 g vs 83.4 g).
- Zucchero decorato santa has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Raspelschokolade weiß has 82% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Raspelschokolade weiß lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Zucchero decorato santa
socker, rismjöl, palmfett, kakaopulver, potatisstärkelse, växtkoncentrat (spirulina, safflor, rödbetsjuice), färgämnen (kurkumin, riboflaviner, briljantblått FCF, kopparkomplex av klorofyller och klorofylliner), naturlig vaniljarom.
Raspelschokolade weiß
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver, Emulgator: Lecithine. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Schalen - früchten enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zucchero decorato santa or Raspelschokolade weiß?
Overall, Zucchero decorato santa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zucchero decorato santa has fewer calories: 427 kcal versus 545 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raspelschokolade weiß has less sugar: 57.2 g versus 83.4 g per 100 g.