Zero tropical vs Waterdrop
Overall, Waterdrop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zero tropical | Waterdrop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 7 |
| Allergens | Orange | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Waterdrop has 94% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 18 kcal).
- Waterdrop has no sugar, while Zero tropical has 1.5 g.
- Only Zero tropical lists: Orange.
Ingredients
Zero tropical
SIROOP MET TROPISCHEVRUCHTENSMAAK, MET ZOETSTOFFEN Ingrediënten Water, vruchtensap uit concentraat 15.5% Isinaasappel 10,7%, mango 2.5%, passievrucht 2,32), vulstof: polydextrose Toedingszuur: citroenzuur, natuurlijke aroma's, paprika-extract verdikkingsmiddel: xanthaangom, zoetstoffen: sucralose steviolglycosiden uit Stevia, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat DE
Waterdrop
Acidifiant acide citrique, extrait de feuille de citronnier, correcteur d'acidité carbonates de sodium, correcteur d'acidité carbonates de potassium, acérola en poudre, arôme naturel, correcteur d'acidité carbonates de magnésium, édulcorant glycosides de stéviol issus de stevia, correcteur d'acidité carbonate de calcium, extrait de café vert, extrait de café, colorant complexes cuivriques de chlorophyllines, vitamine C, acide pantothénique, thiamine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zero tropical or Waterdrop?
Overall, Waterdrop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Waterdrop has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Waterdrop has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.