Comparison
Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick vs Teewurst
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick | Teewurst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 444 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.7 g | 14.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef, Celery, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Teewurst has 12% fewer calories (390 kcal vs 444 kcal).
- Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick has 10% less fat (33.3 g vs 37 g).
- Teewurst has 11% less saturated fat (14.8 g vs 16.7 g).
- Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick has no sugar, while Teewurst has 0.5 g.
- Teewurst has 17% less salt (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick has 61% more protein (33.3 g vs 13 g).
- Only Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick lists: Beef, Celery, Pork.
Ingredients
Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick
Beef, pork, pork broth, salt, flavorings, cultured celery powder, sea salt, caraway seed, granulated garlic, caramel, carmine.
Teewurst
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick or Teewurst?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Teewurst has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 444 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zero Sugar Mini Snack Stick has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.